KTUU.com | Alaska's news and information source | Environmentalists say oil terminal tanks should be emptied

Environmentalists say oil terminal tanks should be emptied

Mount Redoubt hasn't been the best neighbor to the Drift River Oil Terminal. (Zac Gooch/KTUU-TV) Mount Redoubt hasn't been the best neighbor to the Drift River Oil Terminal. (Zac Gooch/KTUU-TV)
Melted glacial debris -- called a lahar -- has taken over much of the Chevron property that the terminal sits on. (Zac Gooch/KTUU-TV) Melted glacial debris -- called a lahar -- has taken over much of the Chevron property that the terminal sits on. (Zac Gooch/KTUU-TV)
A letter from 12 environmental groups asks the Department of Homeland Security to order the terminal to draw down the 6,000,000 gallons of oil left. (KTUU-TV) A letter from 12 environmental groups asks the Department of Homeland Security to order the terminal to draw down the 6,000,000 gallons of oil left. (KTUU-TV)
The U.S. Coast Guard and Chevron say doing that is not a simple task. (Zac Gooch/KTUU-TV) The U.S. Coast Guard and Chevron say doing that is not a simple task. (Zac Gooch/KTUU-TV)

by Leyla Santiago
Friday, March 27, 2009

ANCHORAGE, Alaska -- Mount Redoubt hasn't been the best neighbor to the Drift River Oil Terminal.

This week, melted glacial debris -- called a lahar -- has taken over much of the Chevron property that the terminal sits on.

Some say Chevron is being irresponsible by keeping the oil in the tanks.

"We think there should be a drawn down of the tanks," said Bob Shavelson, Cook Inlet Keeper.

A letter from 12 environmental groups asks the Department of Homeland Security to order the terminal to draw down the 6 million gallons of oil left on the property to prevent an oil spill.

But the U.S. Coast Guard and Chevron say doing that is not a simple task.

"If we should drain the tanks and have amounts of hydrocarbon in there, basically they would become buoyant if lahar fluids came into the dike area," Rod Ficken, the vice president of Cook Inlet Pipe Line Company said. "If we take the oil out of the tanks, the tanks would have to be cleaned. So what's going to happen to all the water that was used in the tanks is going to be contaminated water and it has to go someplace."

They say the risk could be greater if the oil is taken out.

Environmental groups say prevention is more important.

"It makes no sense to leave 6 million gallons of oil at the base of an erupting volcano. We have vitally important fisheries in Cook Inlet that support countless families," Shavelson said.

But Chevron is confident the dike will continue to perform.

Their watchdogs just hope they don't find out otherwise when it's too late.

Contact Leyla Santiago at lsantiago@ktuu.com

You must be logged in to rate this story. Login or register
Comments
Terms of Use: We welcome your participation in our community. Please keep your comments civil and on point. You must be at least 13 years of age to post comments. By submitting a comment, you agree to these Terms of Service
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login or register
See all comments
Close windowBranding

Environmentalists say oil terminal tanks should be emp...

Close window
Powered by WorldNow
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2010 WorldNow and KTUU. All Rights Reserved. For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Meet the News Team, Employment Opportunities, Contact Us and Public Filings.